Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Home Print this page Email this page Small font size Default font size Increase font size Users Online: 1883

 Table of Contents  
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 23  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 8-23

Antihistamines in children: A dermatological perspective

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Muzaffarnagar Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission31-Aug-2021
Date of Acceptance15-Sep-2021
Date of Web Publication31-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Tarang Goyal
Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprosy, Muzaffarnagar Medical College and Hospital, Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/ijpd.ijpd_124_21

Rights and Permissions

Antihistamines are widely used drugs in pediatric population. First-generation antihistamines have been in use since last many years, though adequate data on their efficacy and safety in pediatric population is scarce. In contrast, second-generation antihistamines have been studied extensively in children and have a better safety profile with more receptor selectivity and less adverse effects. Pruritus has a significant impact on the quality of life in children and its management is of paramount importance. This article reviews the first and second-generation antihistamines in the light of recent advances in the understanding of their pharmacological properties and safety profile in children. An extensive literature search was done; all clinical trials, randomized double-blinded or single-blinded controlled trials, open-label studies, retrospective studies, reviews, case series, and case reports focusing on the use of antihistamines in pediatric age groups were screened. The selected articles were retrieved; the final manuscript was prepared, analyzed, and presented in a narrative fashion.

Keywords: Antihistamines in children, atopic dermatitis, newer antihistamines, pediatric, urticaria

How to cite this article:
Kohli S, Tayal R, Goyal T. Antihistamines in children: A dermatological perspective. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol 2022;23:8-23

How to cite this URL:
Kohli S, Tayal R, Goyal T. Antihistamines in children: A dermatological perspective. Indian J Paediatr Dermatol [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Jan 28];23:8-23. Available from: https://www.ijpd.in/text.asp?2022/23/1/8/334663

  Introduction Top

Antihistamines are one of the most commonly used drugs in pediatric dermatology. They are primarily used in children in conditions such as urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, atopic dermatitis (AD), insect bite reactions, and other cutaneous and systemic disorders associated with pruritus. Pediatric population encompasses a wide age group ranging from neonates, infants, toddlers to adolescents.[1] Hence, pediatric drug therapy must be based on specific parameters of that age group and not a blanket approach as there might be different pharmacokinetics at different ages for the same drug.[2]

First-generation antihistamines are still widely used in pediatric population despite numerous adverse effects and lack of adequate data on the efficacy and safety of these drugs in children. This can be attributed to the following facts:

  • Physicians assume them to be safe since they have been in use since decades
  • Pediatric formulations including syrups and drops are easily available over the counter.

The data on efficacy and safety of second-generation antihistamines, however, are well documented in pediatric population which encourages their routine use in the management of pediatric dermatoses.[3]

This article summarizes the pharmacological characteristics and clinical data on efficacy and safety of commonly used antihistamines in pediatric population. Recent updates on novel uses of antihistamines are also discussed.

  Method of Acquiring Data Top

An extensive literature search was done using words such as “antihistamines,” “first-generation H1 antihistamines,” “second-generation H1 antihistamines,” “third-generation antihistamines,” “pediatric,” “children” “urticarial,” “atopic dermatitis,” “mastocytosis,” “hydroxyzine,” “cyproheptadine,” “chlorpheniramine,” “promethazine,” “diphenhydramine,” “ketotifen,” “cetirizine,” “levocetirizine,” “loratadine,” “desloratadine,” “fexofenadine,” “bilastine,” “ebastine,” “rupatadine,” “mizolastine.” All clinical trials, randomized double-blinded or single-blinded controlled trials, open-label studies, retrospective studies, reviews, case series, and case reports concerned with the use of antihistamines in pediatric population were screened. The articles which did not have relevant information were excluded. The selected articles were retrieved; the final manuscript was prepared, analyzed, and presented in a narrative fashion.

  Histamine and its Receptors Top

Histamine is an endogenous biogenic amine formed by the decarboxylation of the amino acid histidine by the enzyme histidine decarboxylase.[4]

By its action on H1 receptors, histamine acts as a potent vasoactive agent, bronchial smooth muscle constrictor, stimulant of nociceptive itch nerves and promotes allergic immune response.[5],[6] It regulates the gastric acid secretion through H2 receptors and plays an important role in neurotransmission and immunomodulation by activation of H3 and H4 receptors, respectively.

  Antihistamines Top

Antihistamines act as an inverse agonist that binds to the same receptor binding site as histamine and not only antagonize the effects of histamine but also exert the opposite effect by suppressing spontaneous receptor signaling.[7]

  Classification Top

Conventionally, H1 antihistamines have been classified into 6 chemical groups [Table 1].[8] However, the functional classification is more clinically relevant in today's scenario [Table 2].[9] Functionally, the H1 antihistamines are classified into first-generation (sedating) and second-generation (relatively nonsedating) drugs.
Table 1: Chemical classification of H1 antihistamines

Click here to view
Table 2: Functional classification of H1 antihistamines

Click here to view

A comparative account of the major differences between the properties of first and second-generation antihistamines is presented in [Table 3].
Table 3: A comparative account of major differences between first-generation and second-generation antihistamines

Click here to view

Some authors have also proposed a new category of third-generation antihistamines with additional properties and less adverse effects, however, till date, there is no consensus with regard to the drugs included in this category.[17]

  First-Generation Antihistamines Top

  • Most of the data for the use of first-generation antihistamines in children has been derived by extrapolation of data in adolescent/adult population assuming that efficacy results in adolescents/adults are also valid in children. However, as immune reaction in under 2 years of age is considered to be different than adults, specific efficacy studies are required targeting the pediatric population[18]
  • First-generation antihistamines can significantly influence a child's quality of life and school performance[19] by inducing sedation and cognitive impairment when taken during the day and poor sleep when taken during night[13],[20]
  • Physicians should also be watchful for anticholinergic side effects[21] of first-generation antihistamines such as

    • Dry mouth
    • Urinary retention
    • Constipation
    • Visual disturbances (mydriasis, photophobia)
    • Tachycardia
    • Drowsiness, confusion, and agitation (high-dose administration).

  • Despite the lack of supporting data, hydroxyzine is commonly used for the treatment of pruritus in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Since histamine is not the primary mediator of uremic pruritus and patients with CKD are at high risk of having prolonged QT interval, hydroxyzine is not recommended in the treatment of uremic pruritus[22],[23],[24],[25]
  • In 2016, health Canada released a warning that hydroxyzine has been associated with QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes which may lead to dizziness, palpitation, seizures, and sudden cardiac death in children.[26] Both the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)[27] and European medicines agency[28] have released similar warnings
  • Similarly, FDA has also released a black box warning regarding the use of phenergan (promethazine) in pediatric patients <2 years of age due to potential risk of fatal respiratory depression. Caution should also be exercised while administering promethazine in children aged 2 years and above.[29]

A brief account of the commonly used first-generation antihistamines is presented in [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6].
Table 4: Pharmacokinetics and drug interactions of commonly used first-generation antihistamine

Click here to view
Table 5: Licensing age, formulation, and dosages of commonly used first-generation antihistamines

Click here to view
Table 6: Indications, contraindications, and common side effects of first-generation antihistamines

Click here to view

  Second-Generation Antihistamines Top

  • The poor receptor selectivity, high lipophilicity, and inadequate pediatric data of first-generation antihistamines led to a need of relatively safer, nonsedating, and well-documented group of drugs. The second-generation antihistamines were then introduced which offered an improved safety profile and were relatively less sedative.
  • Terfenadine and astemizole were the first of second-generation antihistamines marketed. However, due to reports of QT prolongation and life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias including torsade de pointes, FDA recommended discontinuation of both of these drugs. The risk of ventricular arrhythmia was more in patients who had either exceeded the FDA recommended daily doses or taken concurrently with a drug known to interfere with hepatic CYP3A4 isoenzyme activity or had significant liver dysfunction[16],[42]
  • At present, the rules are very stringent with regard to potential cardiotoxicity and newer antihistamines have to pass strict safety controls before being authorized for introduction into the market[18]
  • Among second-generation antihistamines, cetirizine,[43] desloratadine,[44],[45] fexofenadine,[46] levocetirizine,[47] rupatadine,[48] bilastine,[49] and loratadine[43] have been well studied in children and their safety profile is well established.

A brief account of the commonly used second-generation antihistamines is presented in [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9].
Table 7: Pharmacokinetics, food and drug administration approval status, and drug interactions of commonly used antihistamines

Click here to view
Table 8: Licensing age, formulation and dosages of commonly used second-generation antihistamines

Click here to view
Table 9: Indications, contraindications, sedative potential and common side effects of second-generation antihistamines

Click here to view


Antihistamines are the cornerstone for the treatment of both acute and chronic urticaria.

The latest 2018 EAACI/GA2 LEN/EDF/WAO[15] guidelines recommend the following key points for the management of urticaria:

  • The second-generation antihistamines should be the first line of treatment for urticaria
  • The use of first-generation antihistamines is no more recommended for the routine management of urticaria in both adults and children
  • Antihistamines should be taken on a regular basis and not as and when needed
  • Different second-generation antihistamines should not be used at the same time
  • Four fold-up dosing of second-generation antihistamines should be preferred before switching to other treatment options (cyclosporine and omalizumab) in case of unresponsive urticaria.

However, in children <12 years of age, there is a paucity of literature regarding up dosing, but nevertheless, considering the safety profile of second-generation antihistamines and various large controlled studies doubling of the recommended dose can be done.[82]

Cetirizine, fexofenadine, bilastine, ebastine, desloratadine, and rupatadine have been studied in urticaria up to fourfold the recommended dose in more than 12 years of age group and their safety has been established.[88],[89],[90],[91],[92],[93],[94],[95],[96],[97]

Atopic dermatitis

  • The itch in AD is mediated by several mediators other than histamine, such as substance P, IL-31, protease, and gastrin-releasing peptides.[98] Since histamine is not the sole mediator, the usefulness of antihistamines in AD is controversial and debated. The 2019 guidelines on the management of AD in India suggest that a subset of patients of AD with allergic rhinitis and bronchial asthma benefit maximum from antihistamines[99]
  • The sedating properties of first-generation antihistamines have been used by physicians to ameliorate nocturnal itch by inducing sedation. Although they induce sedation but are also known to reduce rapid eye movement (REM) sleep. REM sleep deprivation affects higher cortical functions such as cognition, attention, and memory consolidation.[100] Moreover, their sedative effects persist well into the next day even when taken the night before[19]
  • In a study, atopic children treated with loratadine or placebo demonstrated better learning performance than those treated with diphenhydramine[101]
  • American academy of dermatology recommends against the use of nonsedating antihistamines in the absence of urticaria or rhinoconjunctivitis[102]
  • However, the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines for treating atopic eczema suggest 1-month trial of nonsedating antihistamines in children with severe itching.[7],[103] As there is no difference in treatment efficacy between sedative and nonsedative antihistamines, it is recommended that a nonsedating antihistamines should be selected.[98]

Cutaneous mastocytosis

Nonsedating H1 antihistamines have been recommended for the treatment of pruritus, flushing, urticaria, and tachycardia associated with mastocytosis in children. If necessary, sedating H1 antihistamines may be added on demand depending on severity of disease.[104],[105]

Cetirizine, mizolastine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, and levocetirizine have been shown to have anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing properties.[2],[106],[107],[108]


Antihistamines are useful as an adjunctive therapy in anaphylaxis, insect bite reactions and in the management of various other cutaneous and systemic disorders associated with pruritus.

Over dosage

First-generation antihistamines have frequently been associated with intoxication both accidental and intentional which can be life threatening particularly in children. Diphenhydramine has even been used as an agent of infanticide in the past.[109] The symptoms of intoxication vary from CNS depression in adults to paradoxical stimulation in the form of excitation, hallucinations, convulsions, and death in children.[3]

In the year 2020, FDA has issued a warning that taking higher than recommended doses of the common over-the-counter allergy medicine diphenhydramine (Benadryl) can lead to serious heart problems, seizures, coma, and even death. FDA recommends to keep these medicines out of reach from children to prevent accidental poisonings and misuse, especially when they are home more often due to COVID-19 pandemic.[110]

Second-generation antihistamines are relatively safer and have less side effects in therapeutic as well as overdose. Even with extremely high serum concentration observed in in vitro studies, second-generation antihistamines do not produce significant toxicity.

  What's New in Antihistamines? Top

Antihistamines as an adjunctive treatment in Acne

H1 receptors have been identified on the sebaceous glands, and a possible role of histamine in the production of sebum has been implicated.[111],[112]

Antihistamines have been found to play an adjuvant role in the management of acne by the following mechanisms:

  • They reduce itching associated with acne by inhibiting the release of inflammatory mediators[113]
  • They have a synergistic effect with retinoids:

  • Retinoids reduce sebum in general with little effect on squalene while antihistamines are known to reduce squalene levels[111],[114]
  • Antihistamines reduce the associated adverse effects of retinoids such as itching and acne outbreaks.[115]

Antihistamines which have been studied to be effective as an adjunctive treatment in acne include loratadine,[116] levocetirizine,[113] and desloratadine.[112],[114],[115]

Modulation of antibiotic efficacy by antihistamines

Various authors have hypothesized the following mechanisms by which the antihistamines may enhance the effect of antibacterial drugs:

  • Inhibition of bacterial efflux pumps
  • Inhibition of biofilm formation
  • Alteration of biological membrane permeability because of surfactant like properties of antihistamines[117],[118]
  • Counteracting the effect of histamine produced under stress condition by some bacteria such as  Lactobacillus reuteri Scientific Name Search  Escherichia More Details coli.[119],[120]

El-Banna et al.[116] and Bruer et al.[119] have described the modulation of antibiotic efficacy by antihistamines in their in vitro studies on Klebsiella pneumonia and Escherichia coli.

Mepyramine,[119] promethazine,[116] diphenhydramine, and cetirizine[116] have been shown to increase the efficacy of some antibiotics.

These effects of modulation of antibiotic efficacy are seen primarily with first-generation antihistamines owing to their nonselective receptor binding. The second-generation antihistamines are more specific for H1 receptor and hence do not show these properties to that extent.

The authors have proposed that combined use of antihistamines and antibacterials might be a potential option to treat infectious diseases in the future and to reduce the absolute amount of antibacterials used therapeutically, although in vitro findings n eed to be confirmed in vivo.[116],[119]

  Paradox with Antihistamines Treatment Top

Antihistamine-induced urticaria

Antihistamines are the first-line treatment for urticaria. However, paradoxically, there are reports of antihistamine-induced urticaria. Hypothesis such as haptenization of metabolites, abnormal routes of metabolism, antibody production, complement activation, cross reactivity between metabolites of various drugs, type 1 and type 4 hypersensitivity reactions has been proposed to explain this paradox.

If urticaria lesions tend to persist or worsen despite H1 antihistamine treatment, physician should keep in mind the possibility of this paradoxical effect of antihistamines. Various antihistamines which have been reported to induce urticaria are fexofenadine, loratadine, cetirizine, ebastine, and hydroxyzine.[121],[122],[123],[124],[125]

Antihistamine-induced paradoxical excitation and seizures

The major drawback of first-generation antihistamines is their sedative potential, however, in children, they are paradoxically known to cause excitation, irritability and can precipitate seizures, especially in known epileptics or cases of febrile convulsions.[98],[121],[126] It is hypothesized that first-generation antihistamines may reduce the seizure threshold by blocking the histamine activity in central nervous system.[127]

Third-generation antihistamines

Consensus group on new generation antihistamines (COGNA)[17] in support with British society of allergy and clinical immunology have made recommendations for a drug to classify as third-generation antihistamine, it should have the following properties:

  • Anti-inflammatory effects
  • High therapeutic index
  • Lack of cardiac toxicity
  • Minimal drug interactions
  • Lack of CNS effects
  • Additional effect other than being an H1 blocker.

Till date, no antihistamine drug has fulfilled all these criteria. Rico et al. have analyzed ebastine in light of COGNA recommendation and have suggested that it could be a step forward toward the quest for third-generation antihistamines.[77] Rupatadine also has additional anti-inflammatory effects and platelet-activating factor antagonistic activity apart from being an H1 blocker, however, due to CYP p450 metabolism, it has a potential for drug interactions.[84]

There still seems to be a long way before a novel antihistamine is developed that fulfills all the COGNA recommendations and be classified as a third-generation antihistamine in true sense.

  Conclusion Top

Antihistamines are an important therapeutic class of drugs in children. Since pediatric population encompasses a wide age group, drug therapy in children should be evidence based.

In our department, the first choice of antihistamine in children is always a second-generation drug. Since the therapeutic efficacy of the various second-generation antihistamines is almost comparable, so the choice of drug in an otherwise healthy pediatric patient is dictated by other factors such as financial considerations, academic activities, and school performance. In situations where even mild sedative potential of drugs is undesirable such as school-going children, during examinations where learning performance might get affected, we prefer drugs as fexofenadine and bilastine.

Our preferred antihistamines for various age groups (not in order of preference)

In a pediatric patient with no associated systemic medical conditions,

  • 6 months to 2 years: cetirizine, levocetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine
  • 2 years to 6 years: cetirizine, levocetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, loratadine
  • >6 years: cetirizine, levocetirizine, desloratadine, fexofenadine, loratadine, bilastine.

    In children with associated systemic medical conditions:
  • Children with renal impairment:

    • 6 months to 6 years: desloratadine, fexofenadine (however, dose adjustment required in severe renal impairment)
    • 6 years: bilastine

  • Children with hepatic impairment:

    • 6 months to 6 years: levocetirizine, fexofenadine
    • >6 years: levocetirizine, fexofenadine, bilastine.

  • Children with cardiac impairment:

  • 6 months to 2 years: cetirizine, fexofenadine
  • >2 years: cetirizine, fexofenadine, loratadine.

As many novel antihistamines have now been introduced with additional properties and improved safety profile, it is imperative to raise concerns precluding the routine use of first-generation antihistamines in children. Further research with newer antihistamines focusing on specific pediatric age groups is warranted.

Financial support and sponsorship


Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

  References Top

Setyawati NK, Pusvitasari LW, Rusyati LM, Gotama D. Antihistamine in pediatrics dermatology. Int J Res Med Sci 2020;9:1602-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
de Benedictis FM, de Benedictis D, Canonica GW. New oral H1 antihistamines in children: Facts and unmeet needs. Allergy 2008;63:1395-404.  Back to cited text no. 2
Church MK, Maurer M, Simons FE, Bindslev-Jensen C, van Cauwenberge P, Bousquet J, et al. Risk of first-generation H(1)-antihistamines: A GA(2)LEN position paper. Allergy 2010;65:459-66.  Back to cited text no. 3
Tiligada E, Ennis M. Histamine pharmacology: From Sir Henry Dale to the 21st century. Br J Pharmacol 2020;177:469-89.  Back to cited text no. 4
Simons FE, editor. H1-antihistamines in children. In: Histamine and H1 Antihistamines in Allergic Disease. 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, Inc.; 2002. p. 437-64.  Back to cited text no. 5
Sicari V, Zabbo CP. Diphenhydramine. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK526010/. [Last updated on 2020 Jul 13].  Back to cited text no. 6
Parisi GF, Leonardi S, Ciprandi G, Corsico A, Licari A, Miraglia Del Giudice M, et al. Antihistamines in children and adolescents: A practical update. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2020;48:753-62.  Back to cited text no. 7
Simons FE. Advances in H1-antihistamines. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2203-17.  Back to cited text no. 8
Tripathi KD. Essentials of Medical Pharmacology. 8th ed. New Delhi: JAYPEE Brothers Medical Publishers; 2019.  Back to cited text no. 9
Simons FE, Simons KJ. H1 antihistamines: Current status and future directions. World Allergy Organ J 2008;1:145-55.  Back to cited text no. 10
Mittal PA, Godse KV, Patil SP. Second-generation antihistamines. Indian J Drugs Dermatol 2016;2:3-12.  Back to cited text no. 11
  [Full text]  
Ten Eick AP, Blumer JL, Reed MD. Safety of antihistamines in children. Drug Saf 2001;24:119-47.  Back to cited text no. 12
Simons FE, Simons KJ. Histamine and H1-antihistamines: Celebrating a century of progress. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011;128:1139-50.e4.  Back to cited text no. 13
Fein MN, Fischer DA, O'Keefe AW, Sussman GL. CSACI position statement: Newer generation H1-antihistamines are safer than first-generation H1-antihistamines and should be the first-line antihistamines for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and urticaria. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2019;15:61.  Back to cited text no. 14
Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, Abdul Latiff AH, Baker D, Ballmer-Weber B, et al. The EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy 2018;73:1393-414.  Back to cited text no. 15
Tatarkiewicz J, Rzodkiewicz P, Żochowska M, Staniszewska A, Bujalska-Zadrożny M. New antihistamines – Perspectives in the treatment of some allergic and inflammatory disorders. Arch Med Sci 2019;15:537-53.  Back to cited text no. 16
Holgate ST, Canonica GW, Simons FE, Taglialatela M, Tharp M, Timmerman H, et al. Consensus Group on New-Generation Antihistamines (CONGA): Present status and recommendations. Clin Exp Allergy 2003;33:1305-24.  Back to cited text no. 17
Del Cuvillo A, Sastre J, Montoro J, Jáuregui I, Ferrer M, Dávila I, et al. Use of antihistamines in pediatrics. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2007;17 Suppl 2:28-40.  Back to cited text no. 18
Kay GG. The effects of antihistamines on cognition and performance. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2000;105:S622-7.  Back to cited text no. 19
Church MK, Church DS. Pharmacology of antihistamines. Indian J Dermatol 2013;58:219-24.  Back to cited text no. 20
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Yanai K. Anticholinergic activity of antihistamines. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:633-4.  Back to cited text no. 21
Combs SA, Teixeira JP, Germain MJ. Pruritus in kidney disease. Semin Nephrol 2015;35:383-91.  Back to cited text no. 22
Mettang T, Kremer AE. Uremic pruritus. Kidney Int 2015;87:685-91.  Back to cited text no. 23
Manenti L, Tansinda P, Vaglio A. Uraemic pruritus: Clinical characteristics, pathophysiology and treatment. Drugs 2009;69:251-63.  Back to cited text no. 24
Yosipovitch G, Bernhard JD. Clinical practice. Chronic pruritus. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1625-34.  Back to cited text no. 25
Government of Canada HC. ATARAX (hydroxyzine) – Risk of QT Prolongation and Torsade de Pointes; 2016. Available from: https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/recall-alert-rappel-avis/hc-sc/2016/58758a-eng.php. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 14].  Back to cited text no. 26
FDA Safety Information-Vistaril (hydroxyzine pamoate) Capsules and Oral Suspension. NY: Pfizer; May, 2014. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2014/011459s048%2C011795s025lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 14].  Back to cited text no. 27
Hydroxyzine. European Medicines Agency; 2018. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/referrals/hydroxyzine. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 14].  Back to cited text no. 28
FDA drug Safety Information of Promethazine HCl Tablets and Suppositories. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2004/07935s030lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 20].  Back to cited text no. 29
Malamed SF. Sedation: A Guide to Patient Management. 6th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier; 2017.  Back to cited text no. 30
Paton DM, Webster DR. Clinical pharmacokinetics of H1-receptor antagonists (the antihistamines). Clin Pharmacokinet 1985;10:477-97.  Back to cited text no. 31
FDA Drug Safety Information of Cyproheptadine Hydrochloride Tablets USP. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2009/087056s045lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 21].  Back to cited text no. 32
Gunja N, Collins M, Graudins A. A comparison of the pharmacokinetics of oral and sublingual cyproheptadine. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 2004;42:79-83.  Back to cited text no. 33
Pathirana S, Jayawardena S, Meeves S, Thompson GA. Brompheniramine and chlorpheniramine pharmacokinetics following single-dose oral administration in children aged 2 to 17 years. J Clin Pharmacol 2018;58:494-503.  Back to cited text no. 34
Rumore MM. Clinical pharmacokinetics of chlorpheniramine. Drug Intell Clin Pharm 1984;18:701-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
Southard BT, Al Khalili Y. Promethazine. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2021. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK544361/. [Last accessed on 2020 Jul 10].  Back to cited text no. 36
Gelotte CK, Zimmerman BA, Thompson GA. Single-dose pharmacokinetic study of diphenhydramine HCl in children and adolescents. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev 2018;7:400-7.  Back to cited text no. 37
FDA Drug Safety Information of Diphenhydramine Hydrochloride Injection USP. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/091526lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 38
Grant SM, Goa KL, Fitton A, Sorkin EM. Ketotifen. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in asthma and allergic disorders. Drugs 1990;40:412-48.  Back to cited text no. 39
Sokol KC, Amar NK, Starkey J, Grant JA. Ketotifen in the management of chronic urticaria: Resurrection of an old drug. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013;111:433-6.  Back to cited text no. 40
Markham A, Goa KL. Ketotifen. Clin Immunother 1996;5:400-11.  Back to cited text no. 41
Woosley R, Darrow WR. Analysis of potential adverse drug reactions – A case of mistaken identity. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:208-9.  Back to cited text no. 42
Nayak AS, Berger WE, LaForce CF, Urdaneta ER, Patel MK, Franklin KB, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled study of cetirizine and loratadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Allergy Asthma Proc 2017;38:222-30.  Back to cited text no. 43
Gupta S, Khalilieh S, Kantesaria B, Banfield C. Pharmacokinetics of desloratadine in children between 2 and 11 years of age. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;63:534-40.  Back to cited text no. 44
Gupta SK, Kantesaria B, Banfield C, Wang Z. Desloratadine dose selection in children aged 6 months to 2 years: Comparison of population pharmacokinetics between children and adults. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007;64:174-84.  Back to cited text no. 45
Meltzer EO, Scheinmann P, Rosado Pinto JE, Bachert C, Hedlin G, Wahn U, et al. Safety and efficacy of oral fexofenadine in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis – A pooled analysis of three studies. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2004;15:253-60.  Back to cited text no. 46
Pampura AN, Papadopoulos NG, Spičák V, Kurzawa R. Evidence for clinical safety, efficacy, and parent and physician perceptions of levocetirizine for the treatment of children with allergic disease. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2011;155:367-78.  Back to cited text no. 47
Potter P, Mitha E, Barkai L, Mezei G, Santamaría E, Izquierdo I, et al. Rupatadine is effective in the treatment of chronic spontaneous urticaria in children aged 2-11 years. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2016;27:55-61.  Back to cited text no. 48
Novák Z, Yáñez A, Kiss I, Kuna P, Tortajada-Girbés M, Valiente R, et al. Safety and tolerability of bilastine 10 mg administered for 12 weeks in children with allergic diseases. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2016;27:493-8.  Back to cited text no. 49
Watson WT, Simons KJ, Chen XY, Simons FE. Cetirizine: A pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation in children with seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1989;84:457-64.  Back to cited text no. 50
Desager JP, Dab I, Horsmans Y, Harvengt C. A pharmacokinetic evaluation of the second-generation H1-receptor antagonist cetirizine in very young children. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1993;53:431-5.  Back to cited text no. 51
Spicák V, Dab I, Hulhoven R, Desager JP, Klánová M, de Longueville M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cetirizine in infants and toddlers. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997;61:325-30.  Back to cited text no. 52
Horsmans Y, Desager JP, Hulhoven R, Harvengt C. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of cetirizine in patients with chronic liver disease. J Clin Pharmacol 1993;33:929-32.  Back to cited text no. 53
Campoli-Richards DM, Buckley MM, Fitton A. Cetirizine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical potential in allergic rhinitis, pollen-induced asthma, and chronic urticaria. Drugs 1990;40:762-81.  Back to cited text no. 54
Wood SG, John BA, Chasseaud LF, Yeh J, Chung M. The metabolism and pharmacokinetics of 14C-cetirizine in humans. Ann Allergy 1987;59:31-4.  Back to cited text no. 55
Papadopoulos NG, Zuberbier T. The safety and tolerability profile of bilastine for chronic urticaria in children. Clin Transl Allergy 2019;9:55.  Back to cited text no. 56
Belloni Fortina A, Fontana E. Update on antihistamine treatment for chronic urticaria in children. Curr Treat Options Allergy 2014;1:287-98.  Back to cited text no. 57
FDA Drug Safety of Cetirizine Hydrochloride Tablets and Syrup for Oral Use. USA: Pfizer. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2002/19835s15,%2020346s8lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 21].  Back to cited text no. 58
FDA Drug Safety of Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride. UCB Biopharma. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/022064s038,022157s020lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 59
Cranswick N, Turzíkova J, Fuchs M, Hulhoven R. Levocetirizine in 1-2 year old children: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005;43:172-7.  Back to cited text no. 60
Yumibe N, Huie K, Chen KJ, Clement RP, Cayen MN. Identification of human liver cytochrome P450s involved in the microsomal metabolism of the antihistaminic drug loratadine. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 1995;107:420.  Back to cited text no. 61
Brannan MD, Reidenberg P, Radwanski E, Shneyer L, Lin CC, Cayen MN, et al. Loratadine administered concomitantly with erythromycin: Pharmacokinetic and electrocardiographic evaluations. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1995;58:269-78.  Back to cited text no. 62
Slater JW, Zechnich AD, Haxby DG. Second-generation antihistamines: A comparative review. Drugs 1999;57:31-47.  Back to cited text no. 63
Haria M, Fitton A, Peters DH. Loratadine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in allergic disorders. Drugs 1994;48:617-37.  Back to cited text no. 64
FDA Drug Safety Information of Loratadine Tablets, Syrup and Rapidly Disintegrating Tablets. USA: Schering Corporation. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2000/20641s7lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 22].  Back to cited text no. 65
Ellis AK, Day JH. Second- and third-generation antihistamines in the treatment of urticaria. Dermatol Ther 2000;13:327-36.  Back to cited text no. 66
FDA Drug Safety Information of Desloratadine Tablets, RediTabs and Oral Solution. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2010/021165s014lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 67
Simons FE, Bergman JN, Watson WT, Simons KJ. The clinical pharmacology of fexofenadine in children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1996;98:1062-4.  Back to cited text no. 68
FDA Drug Safety Information of Fexofenadine Hydrochloride Capsules and Tablets. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2003/20786se8-014,20872se8-011,20625se8-012_allegra_lbl.pdf. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 69
Bosma R, van den Bor J, Vischer HF, Labeaga L, Leurs R. The long duration of action of the second generation antihistamine bilastine coincides with its long residence time at the histamine H1 receptor. Eur J Pharmacol 2018;838:107-11.  Back to cited text no. 70
Church MK, Tiongco-Recto M, Ridolo E, Novák Z. Bilastine: A lifetime companion for the treatment of allergies. Curr Med Res Opin 2020;36:445-54.  Back to cited text no. 71
Dávila I, del Cuvillo A, Mullol J, Jáuregui I, Bartra J, Ferrer M, et al. Use of second generation H1 antihistamines in special situations. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2013;23 Suppl 1:1-16.  Back to cited text no. 72
Hurst M, Spencer CM. Ebastine: An update of its use in allergic disorders. Drugs 2000;59:981-1006.  Back to cited text no. 73
Simons FE, Watson WT, Simons KJ. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ebastine in children. J Pediatr 1993;122:641-6.  Back to cited text no. 74
Goyal V, Gupta A, Gupta O, Lal D, Gill M. Comparative efficacy and safety of Ebastine 20 mg, Ebastine 10 mg and Levocetirizine 5 mg in acute urticaria. J Clin Diagn Res 2017;11:WC06-9.  Back to cited text no. 75
Pecoraro L, Paiola G, Pietrobelli A. Ebastine overdose in a child. Clin Case Rep 2017;5:403-5.  Back to cited text no. 76
Rico S, Antonijoan R, Barbanoj M. Ebastine in the light of CONGA recommendations for the development of third-generation antihistamines. J Asthma Allergy 2009;2:73-92.  Back to cited text no. 77
Roberts DJ, Gispert J. The non-cardiac systemic side-effects of antihistamines: Ebastine. Clin Exp Allergy 1999;29 Suppl 3:151-5.  Back to cited text no. 78
Yamaguchi T, Hashizume T, Matsuda M, Sakashita M, Fujii T, Sekine Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics of the H1-receptor antagonist ebastine and its active metabolite carebastine in healthy subjects. Arzneimittelforschung 1994;44:59-64.  Back to cited text no. 79
Roberts DJ, Llenas J. Some observations on the cardiotoxic and drug interaction profiles of second generation antihistamines as measured in the guinea pig. Arzneimittelforschung 1996;46:832-3.  Back to cited text no. 80
Wiseman LR, Faulds D. Ebastine. a review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in the treatment of allergic disorders. Drugs 1996;51:260-77.  Back to cited text no. 81
Caffarelli C, Paravati F, El Hachem M, Duse M, Bergamini M, Simeone G, et al. Management of chronic urticaria in children: A clinical guideline. Ital J Pediatr 2019;45:101.  Back to cited text no. 82
Santamaría E, Izquierdo I, Valle M, Vermeulen J, Potter P. Rupatadine oral solution for 2-5-year-old children with allergic rhinitis: A safety, open-label, prospective study. J Asthma Allergy 2018;11:225-31.  Back to cited text no. 83
Shamizadeh S, Brockow K, Ring J. Rupatadine: Efficacy and safety of a non-sedating antihistamine with PAF-antagonist effects. Allergo J Int 2014;23:87-95.  Back to cited text no. 84
Simons FE, Simons KJ. Clinical pharmacology of new histamine H1 receptor antagonists. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999;36:329-52.  Back to cited text no. 85
Lebrun-Vignes B, Diquet B, Chosidow O. Clinical pharmacokinetics of mizolastine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2001;40:501-7.  Back to cited text no. 86
Gandhi J, Godse K, Godse G. Bilastine: A novel antihistamine. Indian J Drugs Dermatol 2018;4:3-6.  Back to cited text no. 87
  [Full text]  
Sánchez J, Zakzuk J, Cardona R. Prediction of the efficacy of antihistamines in chronic spontaneous urticaria based on initial suppression of the histamine- induced wheal. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2016;26:177-84.  Back to cited text no. 88
Staevska M, Popov TA, Kralimarkova T, Lazarova C, Kraeva S, Popova D, et al. The effectiveness of levocetirizine and desloratadine in up to 4 times conventional doses in difficult-to-treat urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;125:676-82.  Back to cited text no. 89
Siebenhaar F, Degener F, Zuberbier T, Martus P, Maurer M. High-dose desloratadine decreases wheal volume and improves cold provocation thresholds compared with standard-dose treatment in patients with acquired cold urticaria: A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2009;123:672-9.  Back to cited text no. 90
Abajian M, Curto-Barredo L, Krause K, Santamaria E, Izquierdo I, Church MK, et al. Rupatadine 20 mg and 40 mg are effective in reducing the symptoms of chronic cold urticaria. Acta Derm Venereol 2016;96:56-9.  Back to cited text no. 91
Finn AF Jr., Kaplan AP, Fretwell R, Qu R, Long J. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fexofenadine HCl in the treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;104:1071-8.  Back to cited text no. 92
Nelson HS, Reynolds R, Mason J. Fexofenadine HCl is safe and effective for treatment of chronic idiopathic urticaria. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2000;84:517-22.  Back to cited text no. 93
Church MK, Maurer M. H(1)-antihistamines and urticaria: How can we predict the best drug for our patient? Clin Exp Allergy 2012;42:1423-9.  Back to cited text no. 94
Weller K, Viehmann K, Bräutigam M, Krause K, Siebenhaar F, Zuberbier T, et al. Management of chronic spontaneous urticaria in real life-in accordance with the guidelines? A cross-sectional physician-based survey study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2013;27:43-50.  Back to cited text no. 95
Okubo Y, Shigoka Y, Yamazaki M, Tsuboi R. Double dose of cetirizine hydrochloride is effective for patients with urticaria resistant: A prospective, randomized, non-blinded, comparative clinical study and assessment of quality of life. J Dermatolog Treat 2013;24:153-60.  Back to cited text no. 96
Guillén-Aguinaga S, Jáuregui Presa I, Aguinaga-Ontoso E, Guillén-Grima F, Ferrer M. Updosing nonsedating antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2016;175:1153-65.  Back to cited text no. 97
Katoh N, Ohya Y, Ikeda M, Ebihara T, Katayama I, Saeki H, et al. Japanese guidelines for atopic dermatitis 2020. Allergol Int 2020;69:356-69.  Back to cited text no. 98
Rajagopalan M, De A, Godse K, Krupa Shankar DS, Zawar V, Sharma N, et al. Guidelines on management of atopic dermatitis in India: An evidence-based review and an expert consensus. Indian J Dermatol 2019;64:166-81.  Back to cited text no. 99
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Nami M. Medication induced poor sleep and neuro-cognitive consequences in allergic rhinitis: A brief review. Internet J Fam Pract 2011;9:1  Back to cited text no. 100
Vuurman EF, van Veggel LM, Uiterwijk MM, Leutner D, O'Hanlon JF. Seasonal allergic rhinitis and antihistamine effects on children's learning. Ann Allergy 1993;71:121-6.  Back to cited text no. 101
Eichenfield LF, Ahluwalia J, Waldman A, Borok J, Udkoff J, Boguniewicz M. Current guidelines for the evaluation and management of atopic dermatitis: A comparison of the Joint Task Force Practice Parameter and American Academy of Dermatology guidelines. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017;139:S49-57.  Back to cited text no. 102
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atopic Eczema in Under 12s: Diagnosis and Management. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2021.  Back to cited text no. 103
Castells M, Metcalfe DD, Escribano L. Diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous mastocytosis in children: Practical recommendations. Am J Clin Dermatol 2011;12:259-70.  Back to cited text no. 104
Cardet JC, Akin C, Lee MJ. Mastocytosis: Update on pharmacotherapy and future directions. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2013;14:2033-45.  Back to cited text no. 105
Levi-Schaffer F, Eliashar R. Mast cell stabilizing properties of antihistamines. J Invest Dermatol 2009;129:2549-51.  Back to cited text no. 106
Agrawal DK. Anti-inflammatory properties of desloratadine. Clin Exp Allergy 2004;34:1342-8.  Back to cited text no. 107
Baroody FM, Naclerio RM. Antiallergic effects of H1-receptor antagonists. Allergy 2000;55 Suppl 64:17-27.  Back to cited text no. 108
Baker AM, Johnson DG, Levisky JA, Hearn WL, Moore KA, Levine B, et al. Fatal diphenhydramine intoxication in infants. J Forensic Sci 2003;48:425-8.  Back to cited text no. 109
Benadryl (diphenhydramine): Drug Safety Communication – Serious Problems with High Doses of the Allergy Medicine. FDA; September 24, 2020. Available from: https://www.fda.gov/safety/medical-productsafety-information/benadryl-diphenhydramine-drug-safety-communication-serious-problems-high-doses-allergy-medicine. [Last accessed on 2021 Jun 23].  Back to cited text no. 110
Pelle E, McCarthy J, Seltmann H, Huang X, Mammone T, Zouboulis CC, et al. Identification of histamine receptors and reduction of squalene levels by an antihistamine in sebocytes. J Invest Dermatol 2008;128:1280-5.  Back to cited text no. 111
Lee HE, Chang IK, Lee Y, Kim CD, Seo YJ, Lee JH, et al. Effect of antihistamine as an adjuvant treatment of isotretinoin in acne: A randomized, controlled comparative study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2014;28:1654-60.  Back to cited text no. 112
Pandey D, Agrawal S. Efficacy of isotretinoin and antihistamine versus isotretinoin alone in the treatment of moderate to severe acne: A randomised control trial. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ) 2019;17:14-9.  Back to cited text no. 113
Dhaher SA, Jasim ZM. The adjunctive effect of desloratadine on the combined azithromycin and isotretinoin in the treatment of severe acne: Randomized clinical trial. J Dermatol Dermatol Surg 2018;22:21-5.  Back to cited text no. 114
  [Full text]  
Van TN, Thi LD, Trong HN, Van TC, Minh TT, Minh PP, et al. Efficacy of oral isotretinoin in combination with desloratadine in the treatment of common vulgaris acne in vietnamese patients. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2019;7:217-20.  Back to cited text no. 115
El-Banna TE, Sonbol FI, El-Aziz AA, Al-Fakharany OM. Modulation of antibiotic efficacy against Klebsiella pneumoniae by antihistaminic drugs. J Med Microbiol Diagn 2016;5:225.  Back to cited text no. 116
Attwood D, Florence AT. Physicochemical Principles of Pharmacy: In Manufacture, Formulation and Clinical Use. 6th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2016.  Back to cited text no. 117
Hagmar P, Pierrou S, Nielsen P, Nordén B, Kubista M. Ionic strength dependence of the binding of methylene blue to chromatin and calf thymus DNA. J Biomol Struct Dyn 1992;9:667-79.  Back to cited text no. 118
Bruer GG, Hagedorn P, Kietzmann M, Tohamy AF, Filor V, Schultz E, et al. Histamine H1 receptor antagonists enhance the efficacy of antibacterials against Escherichia coli. BMC Vet Res 2019;15:55.  Back to cited text no. 119
Thomas CM, Hong T, van Pijkeren JP, Hemarajata P, Trinh DV, Hu W, et al. Histamine derived from probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri suppresses TNF via modulation of PKA and ERK signaling. PLoS One 2012;7:e31951.  Back to cited text no. 120
Adya KA, Inamadar AC, Palit A. Paradoxes in dermatology. Indian Dermatol Online J 2013;4:133-42.  Back to cited text no. 121
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
Lee SW, Byun JY, Choi YW, Myung KB, Choi HY. Fexofenadine-induced urticaria. Ann Dermatol 2011;23:S329-32.  Back to cited text no. 122
Inomata N, Tatewaki S, Ikezawa Z. Multiple H1-antihistamine-induced urticaria. J Dermatol 2009;36:224-7.  Back to cited text no. 123
González de Olano D, Roán Roán J, de la Hoz Caballer B, Cuevas Agustín M, Hinojosa Macías M. Urticaria induced by antihistamines. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2006;16:144-6.  Back to cited text no. 124
Rodríguez del Río P, González-Gutiérrez ML, Sánchez-López J, Nuñez-Acevedo B, Bartolomé Alvarez JM, Martínez-Cócera C. Urticaria caused by antihistamines: Report of 5 cases. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol 2009;19:317-20.  Back to cited text no. 125
Zolaly MA. Histamine H1 antagonists and clinical characteristics of febrile seizures. Int J Gen Med 2012;5:277-81.  Back to cited text no. 126
Yamashita Y, Isagai T, Seki Y, Ohya T, Nagamitsu S, Matsuishi T. West syndrome associated with administration of a histamine H1 antagonist, oxatomide. Kurume Med J 2004;51:273-5.  Back to cited text no. 127


  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5], [Table 6], [Table 7], [Table 8], [Table 9]


Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

  In this article
Method of Acquir...
Histamine and it...
What's New i...
Paradox with Ant...
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded116    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal